<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:dtvmedia="http://participatoryculture.org/RSSModules/dtv/1.0"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (SOL) Statute of Limitations Letter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nextlevelunlimited.net/blog/sample-sol-statute-of-limitations-letter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nextlevelunlimited.net/blog/sample-sol-statute-of-limitations-letter/</link>
	<description>Debt Free This Year</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 22:59:33 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Next Level Credit</title>
		<link>http://nextlevelunlimited.net/blog/sample-sol-statute-of-limitations-letter/#comment-129005</link>
		<dc:creator>Next Level Credit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nextlevelunlimited.net/blog/?p=27#comment-129005</guid>
		<description>Venkat,
Thanks for your comment. Sounds like ID theft. However you still need to get rid of that. 

Depending on what you stated in your letter, MCM ignored it. We deal with them a lot.
We do not pay nor do we settle. We eliminate. We can help.

Sign in for an analysis today and we can talk Mon-Fri 9-5 EST. See our homepage for the form.

~Next Level Credit~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Venkat,<br />
Thanks for your comment. Sounds like ID theft. However you still need to get rid of that. </p>
<p>Depending on what you stated in your letter, MCM ignored it. We deal with them a lot.<br />
We do not pay nor do we settle. We eliminate. We can help.</p>
<p>Sign in for an analysis today and we can talk Mon-Fri 9-5 EST. See our homepage for the form.</p>
<p>~Next Level Credit~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: venkat</title>
		<link>http://nextlevelunlimited.net/blog/sample-sol-statute-of-limitations-letter/#comment-127429</link>
		<dc:creator>venkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nextlevelunlimited.net/blog/?p=27#comment-127429</guid>
		<description>Help,

I received a collection letter from MCM collection agency about a mobile bill, that i never owned. I checked the reviews of this agency and they were really bad. Hence i sent a debt validation letter (certified). Now after a month, i got another letter which contains the header as SETTLEMENT OPPORTUNITY, where they are giving me 40% discount on the debt.

Please advise?. This is so frustrating.

thanks
venkat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Help,</p>
<p>I received a collection letter from MCM collection agency about a mobile bill, that i never owned. I checked the reviews of this agency and they were really bad. Hence i sent a debt validation letter (certified). Now after a month, i got another letter which contains the header as SETTLEMENT OPPORTUNITY, where they are giving me 40% discount on the debt.</p>
<p>Please advise?. This is so frustrating.</p>
<p>thanks<br />
venkat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Next Level Credit</title>
		<link>http://nextlevelunlimited.net/blog/sample-sol-statute-of-limitations-letter/#comment-91256</link>
		<dc:creator>Next Level Credit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 14:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nextlevelunlimited.net/blog/?p=27#comment-91256</guid>
		<description>Layla,
Thanks for your comment. Who did you pay for the settlement? CIti? Or a collection agency?
This is a common occurrence. 

DO NOT send them any info. It is up to MCM to prove it. 

Yes you can send an SOL letter. We would not send an SOL letter. 

You can go to our home page and sign in for a free analysis if you would like advice.

~Next Level Credit~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Layla,<br />
Thanks for your comment. Who did you pay for the settlement? CIti? Or a collection agency?<br />
This is a common occurrence. </p>
<p>DO NOT send them any info. It is up to MCM to prove it. </p>
<p>Yes you can send an SOL letter. We would not send an SOL letter. </p>
<p>You can go to our home page and sign in for a free analysis if you would like advice.</p>
<p>~Next Level Credit~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Layla Dalton</title>
		<link>http://nextlevelunlimited.net/blog/sample-sol-statute-of-limitations-letter/#comment-90148</link>
		<dc:creator>Layla Dalton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 20:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nextlevelunlimited.net/blog/?p=27#comment-90148</guid>
		<description>Help, I have an account that was paid off on 2007, as a settlement, with Citi bank. MCM is now sending a statement saying that I owe then money + interest. I sent them all documentation saying the account was already paid off. They are telling me that the account numbers are different so therefore they say is it not the account that was settled.  Can i send a SOL letter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Help, I have an account that was paid off on 2007, as a settlement, with Citi bank. MCM is now sending a statement saying that I owe then money + interest. I sent them all documentation saying the account was already paid off. They are telling me that the account numbers are different so therefore they say is it not the account that was settled.  Can i send a SOL letter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Next Level Credit</title>
		<link>http://nextlevelunlimited.net/blog/sample-sol-statute-of-limitations-letter/#comment-28542</link>
		<dc:creator>Next Level Credit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nextlevelunlimited.net/blog/?p=27#comment-28542</guid>
		<description>Alex,
Thanks for your comment. Yes the CA knows it is SOL, however, NO it is not wise to ignore SOL alleged accounts. The CAs will still sue and SOL is NOT a strong defense in the court. Yes the CA will take you to court. Happens all the time.

We do not agree that &quot;any correspondence can potentially hurt you&quot;.

CAs do not care about SOL. Some of them specialize in SOL accounts. 
The CAs DO NOT FOLLOW RULES!

A consumer cannot ignore the CA. That is an ostrich mentality. 

~Next Level Credit~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex,<br />
Thanks for your comment. Yes the CA knows it is SOL, however, NO it is not wise to ignore SOL alleged accounts. The CAs will still sue and SOL is NOT a strong defense in the court. Yes the CA will take you to court. Happens all the time.</p>
<p>We do not agree that &#8220;any correspondence can potentially hurt you&#8221;.</p>
<p>CAs do not care about SOL. Some of them specialize in SOL accounts.<br />
The CAs DO NOT FOLLOW RULES!</p>
<p>A consumer cannot ignore the CA. That is an ostrich mentality. </p>
<p>~Next Level Credit~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://nextlevelunlimited.net/blog/sample-sol-statute-of-limitations-letter/#comment-28347</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 18:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nextlevelunlimited.net/blog/?p=27#comment-28347</guid>
		<description>You do not need to send SOL letters. These people know that these debts are past SOL and they will not sue because they will lose on the simple defense that the debts are past SOL. Any correspondence can potentially hurt you. Ignore and put all expense and time on their end. If they keep calling after having been informed then report them and tell them they are being reported.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do not need to send SOL letters. These people know that these debts are past SOL and they will not sue because they will lose on the simple defense that the debts are past SOL. Any correspondence can potentially hurt you. Ignore and put all expense and time on their end. If they keep calling after having been informed then report them and tell them they are being reported.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Next Level Credit</title>
		<link>http://nextlevelunlimited.net/blog/sample-sol-statute-of-limitations-letter/#comment-11505</link>
		<dc:creator>Next Level Credit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 14:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nextlevelunlimited.net/blog/?p=27#comment-11505</guid>
		<description>To address both comments:

A consumer does not need to sign their &quot;john hancock&quot;. The typed name is sufficient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To address both comments:</p>
<p>A consumer does not need to sign their &#8220;john hancock&#8221;. The typed name is sufficient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whickio</title>
		<link>http://nextlevelunlimited.net/blog/sample-sol-statute-of-limitations-letter/#comment-11461</link>
		<dc:creator>whickio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 04:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nextlevelunlimited.net/blog/?p=27#comment-11461</guid>
		<description>alsdkj, why do you say not to sign letter to CA?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>alsdkj, why do you say not to sign letter to CA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alsdkj saldfkj</title>
		<link>http://nextlevelunlimited.net/blog/sample-sol-statute-of-limitations-letter/#comment-523</link>
		<dc:creator>alsdkj saldfkj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 04:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nextlevelunlimited.net/blog/?p=27#comment-523</guid>
		<description>Do not sign any letter you send to CA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do not sign any letter you send to CA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

